Ira, Irae for Anger

I can’t believe what I’ve just heard on the news... I’m so shell-shocked and angered I almost wish I hadn’t moved from my bed to walk to the living room and switch the TV on. It was Channel 4 news and some guy was talking in front of a projected image of a graph about the latest UN recommendations from that rotten Copenhagen meeting. My mouth opened in utter surprise, perhaps it was dismay, as I listened to what was being said. ‘Climate change’, the biggest fallacy of our times, was being used as an excuse to push the ugly agenda on population number control - read population curbing, here. The summit’s forecast? In a few years, the 6 billions of us will shoot up to 10.5 billions, and guess what, that’s bad for the climate.

One of the main recommendations? I quote: “Educating women to curb climate change”. ARE YOU KIDDING ME? Some guy invited on the news program was talking about the need to start volunteering to only have one child - Hello, China. Well, girls, hang onto your ovaries tightly...

Apparently women are the ones who need to be educated so they will have less kids. It’s a shame they forgot to propose mass neutering of the male population, that would seem like a quicker fix for dear climate change since the majority of women at least in the developing world are still under the thumb of their husbands who are the ones to pick them from the cot to marry them - if they’re lucky not to end up on the meat rack of the rape/ sex exploitation business - and... guess what? They want kids.

Of course, I don’t care about who gets the nip as it is utterly irrelevant in the greater scheme of things. The real issue isn’t about who is asked to get educated (but I needed to express the depth of my anger and contempt for such an obvious patriarchal world government, as always), it is about the wave of horrendous control coming our way from all sides. Just as they dropped that bombshell on the news, they swiftly moved on to discuss upcoming elections in Britain. How sweet. Let’s talk about Labour and Tories, as though the two parties weren’t really about the same thing fundamentally. As if either could bring anything different than what their identical agenda from ‘above’ dictates. As if the ‘politicians’ reciting speeches they don’t even write themselves were really in power of anything but their own fat, corrupted wallets.

Mark my word, first they placed a few issues here and there, like climate change. They revamped it so it looked serious enough to get sheep - oops, sorry, I meant to say people - worried. ‘Don’t use plastic bags, it hurts the planet’, ‘use three bins to recycle everything’, ‘don’t take a bath, take a shower to save water’, ‘don’t eat meat, cattle is bad for the climate’... They used to say things like “think about your grand-children’s future”, but wait - what grand-children? The invisible ones? I don’t see how we’ll need to worry about it once we’re no longer allowed to reproduce.
Then, they start talking about ‘volunteering’... Volunteering to sterilize yourself, volunteering to get abortions (it’s good business for them, they can even recycle aborted embryos and experiment on them - for free)...

Now, let’s sit back and watch what happens next. If ‘volunteering’ doesn’t produce results, they can always impose it on us - hello again, China. After all, they did just that with the Lisbon Treaty, first with Britain, then Ireland (everyone understands the Irish people made a mistake when they first said NO; they really meant YES, right?). But wait - China is one of the big players these days. Forget that there is no democracy or freedom of expression in that country - if you look around closely enough, you’ll realise there is no such thing as a democracy here, either, except we were told time and time again that there was, and like wishful thinking, we all kind of bought it at face value. Ah, the beauty of conditioning.

I have to say I’m more than a little miffed no one ever dared propose less drastic solutions first to that so-called climate change business (ohhh, it is a business, and a lucrative one, but not for us).



Like, I don’t know... I’ll take a silly example: say a ship laden with passengers, food, water, furniture and bricks was beginning to sink in the middle of an ocean. What would common sense dictate we get rid of first? Would anyone really decide people should be thrown overboard first to ease the weight? Common sense would tell a person to throw away the bricks, then the furniture, then the food, then the water. Then you’d lock hands with fellow passengers, pray, and hope you can make it to the shore swimming, or something - or maybe enough time would have passed for another ship to pick you up.

In the case of so-called climate change, I’m left absolutely astounded that people should be the first ones to go (in the sense that we should first stop having 'so many' kids), when cars, planes, fuming factories and all that technology are all nicely kept untouched. Nah, they’ll tell you, stop having so many kids, that’s the real solution - leave the cars alone. Don’t even think about it, just do as we say. We know best. We are the experts, you’re just a drop in the ocean, you know nothing, mate.

By the way, I love the word ‘expert’. Apparently, you can become an ‘expert’ after 10 years of studying a particular subject. Can I claim to be an expert in smelling BS since I’ve been smelling and studying it at school compulsorily for almost two decades? Or does it only really work one way - the corrupt way?



And finally... I kind of miss hearing about global warming in the news every day. What happened to that term, eh? Now it’s all about climate change, but who can spot the not-so-subtle shift, here? There was too much noise within scientific circles, or debate, as to whether it was global warming or cooling, so instead the media was told to go for the blanket term: climate change. See, that way, you can’t accuse anyone of lying - EVER. I mean, doesn’t the weather change all the time, but more importantly, doesn’t climate shift a little over the years naturally?



I don’t know... Maybe some time soon they’ll announce that what really happened to the dinosaurs was that they were all so big that all their farting led to the ice age. If I say that, no one will take me seriously, but if a team of ‘experts’ backed by governments went on the telly to say: “Dinosaurs were so big and there were so many of them that their gas emission became too much to handle, leading to global cooling”, then I wonder how many would simply take it for truth.